Skip Navigation


Journal of Islamic Studies Advance Access first published online on February 21, 2007
This version published online on February 24, 2007

Journal of Islamic Studies, doi:10.1093/jis/etm001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/202    most recent
etm001v2
etm001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Current Issues in Indonesian Islam: Analysing the 2005 Council of Indonesian Ulama Fatwa No. 7 Opposing Pluralism, Liberalism and Secularism

Piers Gillespie

Asia Law Centre, University of Melbourne

E-mail: p.gillespie2{at}pgrad.unimelb.edu.au


   Abstract

Indonesia’s highest council of ulama, the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) recently issued a controversial fatwa opposing pluralism, liberalism and religious secularism that seemed at odds with traditions of Indonesian Islamic thought. The paper argues that this fatwa was a predictable if clumsy, attempt by the MUI to further demarcate a role more aligned to developments within the Indonesian umma that followed the demise of President Suharto in 1998. Through an analysis of both the recent developments in Indonesian Islamic thought and the wider societal efflorescence in Indonesia post-Suharto, the paper demonstrates that the MUI fatwa came about as the result of three interrelated factors: firstly, an effort by the MUI to redefine its role in a rapidly changing environment, secondly, an attempt to arrest the slide in relevance that the MUI were experiencing, and thirdly, as a fatwa born of the frustration with a quarter century of the dominance of neo-modernist Islamic thought in Indonesia. In the conclusion the paper notes that MUI’s challenge for greater legitimacy will continue into the future, given that Indonesia remains, in John Bowen’s terms, a nation ‘criss-crossed’ by competing claims about how people ought to live and what kind of society Indonesia ought to become.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.