Skip Navigation



Journal of Islamic Studies Advance Access published online on February 9, 2007
Journal of Islamic Studies, doi:10.1093/jis/etl071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/163    most recent
etl071v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uslu, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Knowledge and volition in Early AsHlhringari Doctrine of Faith

Ferit Uslu

Hitit University

E-mail: uslu{at}gazi.edu.tr


  Abstract

This article, on the place of knowledge and volition in early Ashlhringari theory of faith up to al-Ghazali (d. 1111), argues that early Ashlhringaris had a rationalistic theory of faith rather than a voluntaristic one. Two lines of evidence are given to support this argument: one based on the Ashlhringari approach to faith as inferential knowledge (knowledge by tasdiq), the other based on their view that knowledge accrues its certainty from conclusive evidence. Further, the paper shows that—because they held that the evidence leading people to faith is sufficient and conclusive—the Ashlhringaris believed that there was no need for a volitional ‘leap of faith’. The paper concludes that early Ashlhringari theory of faith depended upon a strong rationalistic view and is completely rationalistic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.