Skip Navigation


Journal of Islamic Studies Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2009
Journal of Islamic Studies 2009 20(3):317-351; doi:10.1093/jis/etp024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/317    most recent
etp024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abou Al-Shamat, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Educational Divide across Religious Groups in Nineteenth-Century Lebanon: Institutional Effects on the Demand for Curricular Modernization

Hania Abou Al-Shamat

University of Southern California


   Abstract

In nineteenth-century Lebanon, while the Christians attended the newly established ‘modern’ schools the Muslims continued to enrol in ‘traditional’ religious schools. This discrepancy is usually attributed to difference in the supply of schools: missionaries and local Christians establishing new schools on the one hand, and the Muslim ulema's resistance to change on the other. This paper adopts an institutional historical approach and studies this educational divide by shifting focus to demand, to parents’ and pupils’ incentives. Approaching education as an economic investment, it studies the interplay between educational needs and the job market that each community faced. Four factors are pointed out as accounting for the difference in the choices made: military service, appeal of the civil service, existence of parallel institutions—courts and schools, and restrictions on Muslims’ commercial interaction with the West. Such factors maintained the demand for traditional schools by providing job opportunities for their graduates. Those jobs were both economically and socially rewarding so that an immediate shift to ‘modern’ education was unnecessary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.