Skip Navigation

Journal of Islamic Studies 2005 16(1):35-61; doi:10.1093/jis/16.1.35
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shadid, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Koningsveld, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Articles

Muslim Dress in Europe: Debates on the Headscarf

W. Shadid and P. S. van Koningsveld

Tilburg University, the Netherlands Leiden University

In many countries of the European Union, the issue of the Islamic headscarf has resulted in specific legal measures taken by governmental institutions or courts, or in pragmatic compromises reached between parents and school authorities. This holds especially true for the Netherlands, Belgium, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany. As a matter of principle, the relations between public authorities and religious groups, as well as the determination of the place of religion in the public sphere, fall under the sovereignty and exclusive competence of each of the EU member-states. Consequently, the nature and results of discussions in these countries, as well as the compromises reached to resolve conflicts, differ according to the countries’ various educational and constitutional traditions.

In this article attention has been paid, first of all, to the normative views concerning headscarf of Islamic scholars and Islamic religious institutions. In a second section, the authors focus on the role of the Court of Strasbourg in applying the principle of religious freedom in verdicts that can be related directly or indirectly to the issue of the Islamic headscarf. In section 3 an analysis is presented of the various stereotypes on the Islamic headscarf as reflected in court decisions and political discussions, among others: the headscarf as an expression of fundamentalism, as an act of religious propaganda, and as a sign of unwillingness to integrate. In the last section, an overview of the political discussions and legal measures concerning the Islamic headscarf in the Netherlands and Belgium is presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
P. Werbner
Veiled Interventions in Pure Space: Honour, Shame and Embodied Struggles among Muslims in Britain and France
Theory Culture Society, March 1, 2007; 24(2): 161 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.